When can you say to yourself that you’re married! A few many
say it’s not until that two people actually have sex that they are considered
married. If that is indeed the case then what are the ceremonies for?
Some of the many things that we follow hardly make a logical
explanation. The world was practically nude at some point of
time for sure and that time was sure to be our animal instincts on a high. So
didn’t they have companions back then or just bastards were born or maybe they
were casual about it. The concept of Draupadi, wife to Pandavas, is no surprise
in this scenario. If so called God can
be okay with something like that and have over 1 lakh lovers himself, why do we
have to bear with the society. You
actually worship him and who says a person who has about 1 lakh girlfriends
can’t be wise. I’d say he would be exceptionally wise! The thing is that people
worship for their benefits and wishes to come true so in that scenario
upsetting Gods is not good isn’t it!
Christianity and a sect of the people from them were deities to
the nature form of god did sex within a ceremony with people enchanting hymns.
What could that mean? It’s a way of worshipping only? Or maybe the saints found
a way to satisfy their pleasures in the name of holy ceremony. More about the
Hindu mythology is absurd. The facts like wind, water and sun cannot bear sons
or daughters; it was stupid of women to believe that going to the ashrams for
doing so would do any good. And when the child was born, he was given the name
like pawan-putra etc. Thus indirect
mentions of how the knowledge was used back then as means to fulfill different
needs as even today are made now and then in the scriptures. People tend to
ignore them but maybe they are not to be ignored. Maybe the writer had no other
way to write them and so he did write in an indirect form or else the king
might have got him killed. Power and knowledge have always fought, power won but knowledge still survived and still does. The logic of marrying in castes and religions 'only' is unacceptable again. How many 'dasis' the kings used to have. Ever thought that 'kamasutra' took off from India. Still people project all that as holy..Damn you! Keep a limit to being funny man!! Ram seemed so wise and still let Sita into the fire.
Its has become iconic since then that husbands hardly care. There are many western stories we're not aware of still but they're moving back to history fast (<some other day).
Its has become iconic since then that husbands hardly care. There are many western stories we're not aware of still but they're moving back to history fast (<some other day).
So moving back to marriage, what kind of marriage is it
considered to be when a groom sent her wife to the saints to conceive child.
The trend seems to be coming back now. With the sperm bank open, what is to get
married? Will women actually get married in near future? They can conceive a
child anyway and gets a handsome pay! Have marriages been limited to being
together to support each other? Are they becoming materialistic? All say you do
the job and then meet for a brief time drained of energy to have a healthy
conversation. What becomes of such relationship without a huge amount of
patience and perseverance? No wonder
divorces are rampant and cold. Can’t really track how the ceremonies evolved to
become what they are today but these are one of the things that actually help
marriages to be held together. Newer forms are surely coming up like Live-In
relationships but these are not acceptable to the Indian psyche for a long-term
basis. There are values embedded in us which come into play in our thoughts and
actions and so we still live in history and only part in the present!
*The text is not meant to hurt anyone's sentiments. These are my own views on some issues and would take the liability alone to have said them. These are not to be taken towards any religion or any sect.
The thoughts have been taken from psyche of the people.
*The text is not meant to hurt anyone's sentiments. These are my own views on some issues and would take the liability alone to have said them. These are not to be taken towards any religion or any sect.
The thoughts have been taken from psyche of the people.